Undirected graph

In the following undirected graph G the edges v2v3 and v3v4 are bridges

0123456
  • An edge e of an undirected graph G is a bridge if and only if e lies on no cycle of G
  • Every edge of an undirected tree is a bridge

Let G be an undirected graph, by analyzing the properties of the dfs tree we can determine if an edge is a bridge given the following facts:

  • let u and v be two vertices of the dfs such that u is an antecesor of v, also u and v are not adjacent
    • if there’s a back edge vu then none of the edges in the uv path are bridges, if we remove one of them the graph is still connected because of this edge
    • otherwise the edge is a bridge

Implementation notes

  • to check if a succesor of a vertex u has a back edge to a predecessor of u an additional state is stored in each vertex which is the discovery time of the lowest back edge of a successor of u (by lowest back edge we mean the back edge to a vertex with the lowest discovery time) denoted as uback, initially this state is set to the discovery time of the vertex v i.e. uback=uin, this state is propagated when the backtracking is performed
  • let uv be a back edge, when this edge is analyzed the vback state needs to be updated to be the minimum between the existing vback and the discovery time of u, i.e. vback=min(vback,uin)
  • let v be an adjacent successor of u in the dfs tree, when we’ve finished analyzing the branch of the tree because of the uv edge we have to check if the vback state contains a back edge to some predecessor of u (vback is propagated) i.e. uin>vback, if so then uv is not a bridge
int time_spent;

// the adjacency list representation of `G`
vector<vector<int> > g;
// the time a vertex `i` was discovered first
vector<int> time_in;
// stores the discovery time of the lowest predecessor that vertex `i`'s
// succesor vertices can reach **through a back edge**, initially
// the lowest predecessor is set to the vertex itself
vector<int> back;
// the bridges found during the dfs
vector<pair<int, int> > cut_edge;

void dfs(int v, int parent) {
  // the lowest back edge discovery time of `v` is
  // set to the discovery time of `v` initally
  back[v] = time_in[v] = ++time_spent;

  for (int i = 0; i < g[v].size(); i += 1) {
    int next = g[v][i];

    if (next == parent) {
      continue;
    }

    if (time_in[next] == -1) {
      dfs(next, v);
      // if there's a back edge between a descendant of `next` and
      // a predecessor of `v` then `next` will have a lower back edge discovery time
      // otherwise it's a bridge
      if (back[next] > time_in[v]) {
        cut_edge.push_back(pair<int, int> (v, next));
      }
      // propagation of the lowest back edge discovery time
      back[v] = min(back[v], back[next]);
    } else {
      // *back edge*
      // update the lowest back edge discovery time of `v`
      back[v] = min(back[v], time_in[next]);
    }
  }
}

/**
 * Finds the bridges in an undirected graph `G` of order `n` and size `m`
 *
 * Time complexity: O(n + m)
 * Space complexity: O(n)
 */
void bridges() {
  int n = g.size();
  time_spent = 0;
  time_in.assign(n, -1);
  back.assign(n, -1);
  cut_edge.clear();

  for (int i = 0; i < n; i += 1) {
    if (time_in[i] == -1) {
      dfs(i, -1);
    }
  }
}

Directed graph (strong bridges)

Let G be a directed graph, an edge uvE(G) is a strong bridge if its removal increases the number of stronly connected components of G

The following is a connected graph G, every edge but v2v0 is a strong bridge because removing it from G increases the number of strongly connected components, removing v2v0 doesn’t increase the number of strongly connected components so it’s not a bridge

0123

A trivial algorithm to find the strong bridges of a digraph G of order n and size m is as follows:

  • Compute the number of strongly connected componentes of G denoted as k(G)
  • For each edge eE(G)
  • remove e from G
  • compute the number of strongly connected components of G denoted as k(Ge)
  • if k(G)<k(Ge) then e is a bridge

The time complexity of the algorithm above is clearly O(m(n+m))

Let uv be an edge of a digraph G, we say that uv is redundant if there’s an alternative path from vertex u to vertex v avoiding uv, otherwise we say that uv is not redundant, computing the strong bridges is equivalent to compute the non-redundant edges of a graph

http://www.sofsem.cz/sofsem12/files/presentations/Thursday/GiuseppeItaliano.pdf